Saturday, 16 February 2013

ALL ABOARD THE HORROR EXPRESS: REVIEW AND GALLERY


Great entertainment may not always constitute great art in the eyes of highbrow critics and scholars, but there’s no denying the lasting appeal of certain films. Some of these films are the result of intense planning and preparation; they’re guided by a sense of purpose and have the benefit of a crack team of technicians and artisans at their disposal. Others more or less just happen. It seems safe to say that Horror Express falls into this latter category.


Legend has it that producer Bernard Gordon, having just overseen the filming of Pancho Villa (1972), starring Telly Savalas, had access to some elaborate miniature train sets from that production; itching to get his moneys worth out of the investment, he decided to get another picture on the rails right away. Enlisting the services of American screenwriters Arnaud d’Usseau and Julian Zimet (writing under the name Julian Halevy), Gordon gave them free reign to come up with a budget-friendly scenario that could be set aboard a train. Zimet and d’Usseau concocted a wild and wooly combination of horror, intrigue and science fiction, cribbing elements from Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) and The Thing (1951), with a touch of Agatha Christie’s Murder on the Orient Express, while scratching the surface of the more cerebral sci-fi fantasies of acclaimed screenwriter Nigel Kneale. The end result is something of a mishmash and it doesn’t really bear close scrutiny, but in the hands of director Eugenio Martin, it rattles along at such a fantastic pace, it really doesn’t matter much.


Key to the film’s success was the casting of horror icons Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. The two actors, with their contrasting styles - Lee, cool and introverted; Cushing, warm and jittery - had become modern answer to Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi thanks to the success of Hammer Films’ The Curse of Frankenstein (1957), Dracula (1958) and The Mummy (1959), but few of the films they acted in really gave them much of a chance to interact with each other. In a typical Hammer horror, they’d have a few terse encounters, then they’d engage in a duel to the death at the end of the picture; given that Lee was typically cast as the villain, he seldom emerged victorious, needless to say. 


By the 1970s, the two actors had gone down very different career paths. Cushing, devoted to his ailing wife and content among the familiar trappings of the English countryside, tended to stick close to home; Lee, an outspoken critic of the British tax system, relocated his wife and daughter to Switzerland for a period in the 1960s, and embarked on a campaign for international stardom by appearing in as many foreign language films as possible - it was a move that made him more immediately recognizable in other countries, especially since the multi-lingual actor was able to actually perform in their own language, without the aid of a dubbing artist. Cushing’s career was in a bit of a slump, thanks to a string of less than stellar vehicles that exploited his name and offered little in return beyond the sheer joy of working; Lee’s, on the other hand, was in the ascent - he had fought long and hard to achieve mainstream recognition, and felt vindicated when he was cast in his first western (Hannie Caulder, 1970) and, most notably, when he landed a plum supporting role in Billy Wilder’s big budget The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes (1970). For Lee, fresh horizons were in evidence; for Cushing, his life was quietly crumbling about him, as his beloved wife Helen eventually succumbed to emphysema in 1971.


Cushing’s grief over her passing is legendary - his devotion to her is truly the stuff of great romance, and his only solution to shouldering the burden was to throw himself into more and more work. He literally accepted everything he could fit on his plate, sometimes to the detriment of his legacy - he may have always delivered a professional performance, but sometimes critics found themselves wondering what on earth compelled him to accept the films he agreed to appear in. On the other hand, Lee’s attempts to be choosy sometimes back fired - thus, faced with a suddenly empty slate after a string of proposed projects stalled, he would reluctantly don the cape of his most iconic role, Count Dracula; he loved the role, but hated what Hammer was doing to the bloodsucker, and he didn’t mind letting the press know it, either. Lee’s image as a prickly, opinionated man contrasts vividly with Cushing, about whom seldom a bad word is uttered. If Lee sometimes came off as arrogant and demanding, Cushing was the soul of gentility. One thing was certain, however - they had terrific chemistry (and unlike Karloff and Lugosi, they were good friends off screen) and their names together on a poster was a benefit to many low budget horror items. In preparing Horror Express, producer Gordon and director Martin were fortunate indeed to snag them both. While Lee’s presence in a Spanish horror title was nothing new (he had just recently completed several films for Spanish enfant terrible, Jess Franco), Cushing’s presence was much more unexpected.  


Indeed, following Helen’s death, the once travel-shy Cushing broadened his horizons somewhat, accepting assignments in France and Greece, among other countries, though he remained fonder of working in England than anywhere else in the world. The two men had already appeared in numerous “home grown” pictures together, but Horror Express would mark their first - and last - collaboration outside of the UK. As it happens, the entire enterprise nearly fell through when Cushing attempted to bail upon arrival in Spain. As he explained to producer Gordon, the Christmas holidays (the filming took place at the end of ‘71) were nearing, and it was his first Christmas in many years without Helen at his side; a fit of melancholy ensued and he advised Gordon that he felt it best to resign from the picture in person, rather than doing so by cable. A panic-stricken Gordon turned to Lee for assistance, and as the story goes, the outwardly aloof actor managed to make his friend and colleague feel at home and all talk of abandoning ship ceased. Lee and his family would even invite Cushing to spend the holidays with them, thus creating a little slice of Britannia for the grieving actor who otherwise might have felt adrift in a strange land.


Fans of these two fine actors therefore owe a debt of gratitude to Lee, for his  intervention ensured the completion of one of the most purely enjoyable films they would ever be a part of, either alone or as a team. Hammer consistently cast the two men as adversaries, thus ensuring that their screen time together was limited. It took a sojourn to Spain for their fans to finally see them carrying a film together - as equals, sharing barbs at each other’s expense and clearly enjoying the hell out of doing so.



Lee starts the film in typical stuffy fashion. He portrays the eminent anthropologist Sir Alexander Saxton, who has uncovered what appears to be the fossil of a missing link while on an expedition in Manchuria. Saxton is abrassive, opinionated, imposing, intimidating - in short, very much the usual Christopher Lee we’ve grown to know and love. As the film unfolds, however, the character grows in an interesting way. His so-called fossil thaws out and goes on a killing spree. He is as incredulous as he is intrigued, but his initial iciness begins to melt, as well, and he becomes determined to fix the wrong he has unintentionally inflicted on the other passengers. Along the way he strikes a few romantic sparks with a beautiful Russian countess (Silvia Tortosa), and he presents as a dashing man of action. It’s a good part, and he’s simply delightful in it.



Cushing is also cast very much to type. He portrays the impish and devious Dr. Wells, a rival of Saxton’s who unknowingly speeds the catastrophe along by bribing a baggage attendant to open Saxton’s myserious crate and “take a peek at what’s inside.” Cushing clearly relishes deflating Lee’s pomposity, knowingly pushing his buttons and stirring the pot in a marvellously sly manner. Cushing, too, takes a romantic interest in one of the passengers - in his case, a sexy Russian spy (Helga Line, veteran of many Spanish horror items, including Paul Naschy’s Horror Rises from the Tomb, 1973). This leads to some marvellous comedic situations, notably when Saxton manages to get his own back at Wells by barging his way into the cabin when the latter is eagerly trying to console the young woman. Truth be told, the Wells character is a bit of a meddling jerk, but he, too, becomes more heroic as the action unfolds.



In addition to the wonderful central performances by Lee and Cushing, Horror Express has a grab bag of familiar “Euro cult” performers. Julio Pena (Werewolf Shadow) is excellent as the stern police inspector who becomes possessed by the alien, Jorge Rigaud (A Lizard in a Woman’s Skin) brings sly humor and gravitas to his role as the condescending Count, and the aforementioned Helga Line is wonderfully sly and sexy as the spy. Best of all is Alberto DeMendoza (The People Who Own the Dark), cast as a “mad monk” named Pujardov. The character is clearly modeled on that of Rasputin, and the wild-eyed DeMendoza plays the part for all it’s worth. Given that Lee had previously played the “real” Rasputin so memorably (albeit in a palid film, Hammer’s Rasputin the Mad Monk, 1965), it’s amusing to see him reacting with such disdain and contempt to Pujardov’s biblical rantings. Last but not least, let us not forget Telly Savalas, who shows up just when things are threatening to run out of steam - he isn’t the most likely Cossack ever seen on screen, but no matter… he’s a hoot in the role, and he knows it. Savalas chews the scenery with abandon, and his confrontation with stiff upper lip Brits Lee and Cushing (whom the Greek-American actor would later recall with respect and admiration) is a joy to behold.




Added to the wonderful cast, Horror Express has much to laud in the technical department as well. John Cacavas contributes a haunting, Ennio Morricone-inspired soundtrack, while ace cinematographer Alejandro Ulloa (Jess Franco’s The Diabolical Dr. Z, 1966) helps to disguise the low budget with some elegant lighting and camerawork. Director Martin, who would later helm several other (but less memorable) horror items, keeps the pace moving at breakneck speed. He also displays an appreciation of the script’s sly, tongue in cheek wit, ensuring that Horror Express is always first and foremost a fun film. It may not reinvent the wheel or aspire to make profound social comments, but this is horror entertainment at its finest, acted and directed with an incisive mixture of commitment and irony. It is also, arguably, the only Christopher Lee/Peter Cushing film that really properly exploits the tremendous chemistry these two men had on screen. On that level alone, Horror Express is essential viewing for all Lee and/or Cushing fans.


Author’s Note: I would like to acknowledge the book Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing And Horror Cinema: A Filmography, by Mark A. Miller, for providing essential background information on the making of this film.
Feature: Troy Howarth
Images: Marcus Brooks

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

LAST RITES: 'THE SATANIC RITES OF DRACULA' : RARE PHOTOGRAPH GALLERY


For Hammer Studios, Dracula would remain a lucrative cash cow throughout the 1960s. Despite ongoing protestations by star Christopher Lee, who argued that the studio cared more about shoehorning him into increasingly desperate storylines than they did about properly exploiting Bram Stoker’s famed literary icon, the character would be killed off and resurrected time and time again. For a period of time, continuity was maintained. In 1970, Scars of Dracula broke from this tradition by essentially rebooting the franchise. It also introduced a nasty, bloodthirsty streak that made earlier entries look tame - much to the consternation of Lee, who worried - quite rightly, as history would have it - that the series was on the verge of self parody. Hammer’s next step would prove even more irksome to their outspoken star - they elected to bring Dracula in to the modern day (or rather, their rather middle aged notion of youth culture) in Dracula AD 1972. The film had its share of problems, but it offered good production values and the long awaited return of Peter Cushing as Professor Van Helsing - albeit a modern day descendant. These factors alone were enough to put the film several pegs above its tacky predecessor, and they also ensured proper theatrical exposure courtesy of Warner Brothers.  


The film was reasonably successful at the box office, but not exactly the bonanza Warners were hoping for - thus, their contracted follow up, initially titled Dracula Is Dead… And Well And Living In London, was already in production by the time the distributor lost interest in the project. And so it would come to be that the final Hammer Film Production to costar Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing would fall into the hands of Dynamite Entertainment, who would grant the film a perfunctory release in the United States in 1978, shorn of four minutes of footage and under the generic title Count Dracula and His Vampire Bride - a full five years after failing to set the box office on fire for Warners in the UK, under its best known moniker, The Satanic Rites of Dracula.


The screenplay by Don Houghton has genuine promise - so much so that one frankly regrets the decision to make it another Dracula sequel. Without the frankly gratuitous presence of the old Count, it might have emerged as an engaging occult thriller, perhaps with Van Helsing on board as a sort of expert in the field. Much of the narrative is actually carried by Inspector Murray (Michael Coles, reprising his role from Dracula AD 1972 with an incongruous “modish” haircut) and MI5 agent Torrence (William Franklyn) as they investigate the kidnapping and murder of a government agent. The killing is linked with a top secret occult society, whose members are comprised of some of the top ranking members of the British government. This modern day Hellfire Club has the makings of a truly interesting plot point, but Houghton loses sight of it because he’s obliged to bring Dracula into the fold. Even Van Helsing seems a trifle underused here, with Cushing sitting rather wistfully on the sidelines for a good chunk of the film. It takes forever for Dracula to make his appearance, and when he finally does, Lee seems as disenchanted with the role as he did in Scars of Dracula. Things liven up towards the end, however, when Cushing and Lee get to play off of each other - a game of cat and mouse commences with Van Helsing visiting the offices of a shadowy businessman known as DD Denham, whom he knows to be Dracula in disguise.
 

The notion of Dracula as a symbol of a corporate bloodsucking is an irresistible one, but it, too, gets the short shrift in favor of trotting out the usual fiery conflagration. Even so, Lee has fun with the role during this scene, adopting a mock Bela Lugosi accent as he lingers in the shadows, just waiting for Van Helsing to blow his cover. This inevitably occurs, and the gloves are off for the final showdown. Hammer’s screenwriters typically found outre manners in which to dispose of the Count, but here Houghton falls back on an idea that sounded better on paper than it plays out on screen - Van Helsing lures Dracula into the woods and uses himself as bait, thus prompting the Count to tear himself to shreds in a Hawthorne bush - the very plant which provided Christ with his crown of thorns, and thus quite deadly to a vampire.


Hammer’s King of the Undead is thus reduced to an ill tempered klutz, tripping about and getting more and more battered, before Van Helsing drives the point home with one last stake to the heart. As demises go, this was probably Lee’s most ignominious prior to Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005). It would probably sting a little less (pun intended) were it not for the fact that this film marked the end of an era. Lee would go on to costar with Cushing in a few more films - notably the all-star horror spoof The House of the Long Shadows (1983) - but this would be their final confrontation at Hammer. It would also mark Lee’s final appearance as Count Dracula, though the French farce Dracula and Son (1976) - a charming and stylish venture, far superior to most of the Hammer sequels, for what it’s worth - saw him donning cloak and fangs in the context of a gentle parody. Cushing would reprise his role as Van Helsing one last time, appearing in Hammer’s bizarre horror/kung fu mishmash The Legend of the Seven Golden Vampires (1974). 


For fans of the franchise, The Satanic Rites of Dracula is neither fish nor fowl - it doesn’t come close to matching the magic of Horror of Dracula (1958) or Dracula - Prince of Darkness (1965), nor does it scrape the bottom of the barrel like Scars of Dracula. The script flirts with interesting concepts but fails to elaborate on them. Cushing and Lee give solid, professional performances, but neither can be said to be truly at their very best. Production values are solid, but unremarkable. Director Alan Gibson approaches the action briskly but without much style - he arguably brought far more pizzazz to Dracula AD 1972, despite some painful padding - and John Cacavas’ funky soundtrack couldn’t be further removed from the grand tradition of Hammer scoring, as exemplified by the work of James Bernard. It’s not a bad film, but it seems a weak, half-hearted way of ending a once-imposing series of horror films.


REVIEW: Troy Howarth
Images: Marcus Brooks
 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...