In the 1960s, screenwriter Jimmy Sangster        made a jump from 
       Gothic horror to the realm of sting-in-the-tail suspense.  It was a move the writer        craved, as the        Gothic was never a milieu that much appealed to him.  He
 drew inspiration,        instead, from the        classic French 
thriller Les Diaboliques (1955), directed by        Henri Georges       
 Clouzot.  Clouzot’s        reputation rivaled        that 
of Alfred Hitchcock in his native France ,        though his name never 
became quite as prominent on an        international level.

 
Hitchcock
        had reportedly attempted to buy the        rights to the novel 
upon which the film was based himself, and        when Clouzot       
 beat him to the punch, he persuaded the authors, Pierre Boileau        
and Thomas        Narcejac, to write him a fresh piece of material; he 
would use        this material as        the backbone for his 
masterpiece Vertigo (1958).  Les Diaboliques may not       
 seem as fresh and        vital today, but this is easily explained by 
the fact that it        was ripped off        many times – and nobody 
drew more inspiration from it than        Sangster        himself.
 

 

 
Indeed,
 while        many critics        would label the thrillers Sangster 
wrote for Hammer as “mini        Hitchcocks,” the        screenwriter 
was always quick to point out that they were truly         “mini 
Clouzots.”  The        series got off to a winning start 
with        Taste of Fear (1960), which was directed by the gifted Seth 
       Holt.  The film adopts        the Diaboliques formula: an       
 innocent woman is driven to the brink of madness by callous        conspirators.
Taste
 of        Fear proved successful with critics        and audiences 
alike, and Sangster would follow up with Paranoiac        (1962),       
 Nightmare and Maniac (both 1963), Hysteria (1964), and Crescendo       
 (1969).  The Nanny (1965)        and the Richard 
Matheson-penned        Die Die My Darling! (1964) are also often lumped 
into this        series, but the        former isn’t really much of a 
twist-laden shocker, while the        latter was done        without 
Sangster’s involvement.
 

 

 
One        script that 
Sangster wrote during this time frame was titled The        Claw, and it
        dealt with a woman being terrorized by a man with a prosthetic  
      arm.  For whatever        reason, it never saw the light        of day in the 60s, though it would later be dusted off in
 1972,        when it would        emerge as Fear in the Night.
The story is a simple one: psychologically        fragile Peggy   
     (Judy Geeson) goes to live with her husband Robert (Ralph Bates)   
     at the boys        boarding school where he as just been hired to 
teach.  While there, she begins        seeing and hearing        many strange things.  Could        the        one-armed, reclusive school master, Michael (Peter Cushing), be        responsible?

 
As a thriller, Fear in the Night is pretty        much lacking in        thrills.  And as a        suspense film, it’s        also very much lacking in suspense.  The        issue is in the casting, though not in the acting. 
 Everybody is cast much too        much to type, thus        
making it easy to figure out who is trying to get one over on        
whom.  If Geeson and Joan        Collins (cast, something  
      unbelievably, as Cushing’s wife) had swapped roles, for example,  
      the twists and        turns of the scenario would have been a 
little less glaringly        obvious.  As it stands,        though, Geeson is very much in        victim mode throughout, while Collins is her usual bitchy self.  Cushing’s
 role is very much        of the red        herring variety, and while 
it worked well enough with        Christopher Lee in Taste        of 
Fear, there’s never very much doubt that the character of        Michael
 is pretty        much harmless.  That’s        not to say that        the actors do a poor job – it’s not exactly a tour de force for        anybody       
 involved, of course, but the four principal players (especially        Geeson) are in        good form.
 
  

 
Much of the blame can be leveled at Sangster,        who in       
 addition to writing (with some polish by Michael Dyson), also        
made another        crack at directing with this picture.          The
 film followed on the heels of Lust for a Vampire and        The Horror 
of        Frankenstein (both 1970), neither of which had gone over very 
       well.  To his credit,        Sangster displays  a
        little more flair behind the camera this        time around – 
there are a few nicely staged sequences, and a        memorable credits 
       sequence with the camera prowling about the deserted school      
  grounds before        settling on the unexpected intrusion of a pair 
of feet dangling       
 from the air,        indicating that something has gone awry.          Indeed, there is enough here to make one wonder if maybe        he didn’t have        a much better film in him down the road.          As
 it stands, however, this would mark Sangster’s last        outing as a 
       director; he would spend the remainder of his career as a        
 “jobbing” writer and a        mercifully pragmatic interview subject.
Fear in the Night failed to ignite much        interest, and it   
     would later be released to VHS under the title Dynasty of Fear     
   in an obvious        bid to capitalize on Collins’ renewed popularity
 as Queen Bitch        on the popular        American soap opera, 
Dynasty.  It        would        mark the end of Hammer’s 
run of psychological thrillers,
 with        the company        limping through the next few years 
attempting to trade on their        most popular        franchises of 
yore, principally Dracula and Frankenstein
Written by Troy Howarth
Images and design: Marcus Brooks